PRESS RELEASE


 
Release Date:  April 21, 2005
Contact:  Michael Rushford
(916) 446-0345

SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW RULING DELAYING
TENNESSEE EXECUTION

The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument Tuesday in a Tennessee capital murder case. The state appealed a federal appeals court ruling which granted additional delay to a murderer’s execution. The case of Bell v. Thompson focuses on a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals June 2004 ruling reversing itself on a claim it previously deemed meritless. The court ordered further hearings for a conviction and sentence which occurred 20 years ago. The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation has filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief encouraging a decision overturning the Sixth Circuit ruling.

The case involves the brutal robbery and murder of a woman in Shelbyville, Tennessee, on New Year’s Day in 1985. That day, Gregory Thompson and a teen-age, female companion abducted Brenda Lane at knifepoint in a Wal-Mart parking lot. Thompson forced Lane to drive to a remote area where he stabbed her repeatedly and then ran over her with her own car. The car was later found in Marietta, Georgia, where Thompson lived. At the time of Thompson’s arrest, a traffic ticket found in his jacket showed that he had been cited while driving the victim’s car from Tennessee to Georgia. Shortly after his arrest, Thompson confessed to the murder and showed police the location of the victim’s body. At trial, a pathologist testified that Ms. Lane had suffered multiple stab wounds and would have remained conscious until she bled to death. After considering the overwhelming evidence of guilt, a jury convicted Thompson of first-degree murder.

During the subsequent sentencing hearing, Thompson’s attorney introduced the testimony of family members and friends to encourage mercy from the jury. A defense psychologist testified that Thompson felt remorse for the murder. The prosecution presented evidence of Thompson’s violent record and dishonorable discharge from the Navy. A prosecution psychologist testified that he found no remorse in Thompson and that he had tried to fake a mental disorder, claiming he heard voices and was unable to read. After reviewing this evidence, the jury found three aggravating circumstances related to the murder and sentenced Thompson to death.

On appeal, Thompson’s multiple claims of trial and sentencing error were rejected by the state court of appeals and further review was denied by the state supreme court. Later, a federal District Court denied Thompson’s claims on habeas corpus, including his mental claims. The court refused to reopen the case when Thompson submitted an additional psychologist’s report he had previously omitted. In January 2003, the Sixth Circuit upheld the District Court’s rejection of Thompson’s claims. In December of that year the United States Supreme Court refused to hear Thompson’s appeal. The Tennessee Supreme Court subsequently set an execution date for August 19, 2004. As this was occurring and without giving the state notice or any opportunity to present argument, a judge of the federal Court of Appeals, who had written the opinion affirming Thompson’s conviction and sentence, conducted his own review of the case. Six months later, on June 23, 2004, the panel reversed its earlier ruling and ordered the District Court to accept Thompson’s new psychiatric evaluation and hold another hearing to determine his mental condition. When the Supreme Court agreed to hear Tennessee’s appeal of this surprise ruling, CJLF joined the case. The Foundation argues that the Sixth Circuit manipulated legal procedure to reconsider Thompson’s claims and misinterpreted Supreme Court precedent and federal law. “When the Supreme Court denies review of a case, that should normally be the end. Further review should be reserved for the rare cases where there is a genuine question of guilt, which there is not in this case,” said CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger.


CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger is available for comment at (916) 446-0345.
The Foundation has helped win three U. S. Supreme Court decisions during the current term.
CJLF's Brief in Bell v. Thompson is available on the internet at http://www.cjlf.org/briefs/ThompG.pdf