![]() |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR SURVIVAL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
California Supreme Court No. S073451
ORAL ARGUMENT DATE: December 8, 1999
Interest of amicus curiae
Summary of facts and case
Summary of argumentI. Under the First Amendment, an ordinance does not violate the "content neutrality" requirement merely because it targets solicitation
A. Time, place, manner, and expressive conduct
B. Content neutralC. Solicitation
1. Early cases
2. HeffronII. Valid regulations need not be the "least restrictive means"
III. The California Constitution does not differ from the federal in this area
A. Wording and history
B. Supreme Court cases
C. Court of Appeal casesConclusion
Appendix A-- Excerpts of Plaintiffs' Brief in Xiloj-Itzep v. City of Agoura Hills (Not reproduced on the web.)