![]() |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
SOLOMON v. CURTIS
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 00-1692
ORAL ARGUMENT DATE: Pending
Summary of facts and case
SSummary of argumentI. The AEDPA should be construed and applied to simplify and streamline the resolution of habeas corpus cases
II. The state court's selection of the governing rule stands unless it is contrary to a Supreme Court precedent which clearly applies to the issue before the court
III. Analysis of questions of law should begin, and generally end, with § 2254(d)(1)
IV. The rule petitioner seeks to apply is not "clearly established"
A. Supreme Court Cases
Conclusion
B. Other Jurisdictions