![]() |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
MARYLAND v. PRINGLE
United States Supreme Court No. 02-809
ORAL ARGUMENT DATE: November 3, 2003
Summary of facts and case
Summary of argumentI. The Maryland Court of Appeals incorrectly focused its probable cause analysis on the elements of the crime of drug possession
II. Probable cause's relaxed standard does not require police to narrow their suspicion to a single suspect before making an arrest
A. The relaxed standard
B. Arrests and investigation
1. Common law roots
2. The modern standard
C. ConflictIII. There was probable cause to arrest all three occupants of the car
Conclusion