![]() |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
ATKINS v. VIRGINIA
United States Supreme Court No. 00-8452
QUESTION PRESENTED: Should substantial portions of Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302 (1989) and Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U. S. 361 (1989) be overruled in order to create a constitutional categorical exemption from capital punishment for mental retardation?ORAL ARGUMENT DATE: February 20, 2002
Interest of amicus curiae
Summary of facts and case
Summary of argumentI. The Court should not unsettled its capital punishment jurisprudence at this late stage
A. The legacy
B. The cost1. Precedent
2. Disruption
3. Complexity
C. The bargain
4. ArbitrarinessII. In the event that a categorical exemption for mental retardation is created, the rules and procedures governing that determination should be left to the states
Conclusion